[Shiragana] It’s time to solve the forced collection problem and find a new solution through bilateral talks!

This is a path of worsening relations between Korea and Japan. The problem began with a compulsory judgment by the Korean Grand Court. The Korean Grand Court has changed the position of the government so far and has recognized the liability of Japanese companies for compensation. The 2012 decision was the beginning, and the final decision in 2018 marked a major turning point. Japan strongly repelled that the Korean-Japanese basic treaty system concluded in 1965 would shake if this decision was followed. Japan has so far agreed that "the problem has been solved", so the Korean government requested that a plan be prepared to prevent damage to Japanese companies. Since 2012, the atmosphere in Korea has been reluctant to deal with this issue. It must have been conscious of national sentiment. Since the negative response psychology was at the bottom, a social atmosphere was formed which was recognized by the convenience of Korea rather than looking straight at the reality. A response plan was devised in such an atmosphere. From the beginning, South Korea did not consider the impact of the judgment so seriously. Immediately after the final ruling, Japan requested bilateral talks based on the 1965 agreement, and South Korea did not respond to the idea that the government was “unavoidable” about the ruling. Japan then stipulated in the agreement the Arbitration Committee, the next stage of the two-party talks. Korea did not respond to this. 8 months have passed. In Japan, the recognition of Korea has dramatically changed after the conviction. Many Japanese believe that Korea is not a friendly country. This was a completely new phenomenon. However, in South Korea, I thought that it was the reaction level in Japan that was seen during past normal conflicts. ◆ We can get out of a vicious circle only by looking for solutions In such an environment, the 20 major countries / regions (G20) summits will be held in Japan. The idea was that Japan would not hold a Korea-Japan summit unless a solution related to recruitment was presented. Just before the G20 summit, South Korea presented a 1 + 1 plan where Korean companies and Japanese companies spontaneously come together. South Korea said that if Japan accepts this proposal, it would hold a bilateral talk. Strictly speaking, it was not a voluntary output because it was an agreement between governments on the output of companies. Japan refused to feel that it would damage Japanese companies, and manipulated export restrictions. Japan's export restrictions inspired the intense reaction of Korea. It led to frontal competition. It is true that it is disadvantageous for Korea when comparing cards cut in Korea and Japan, but such a realistic issue was forced out before the national sentiment. South Korea's frontal opposition triggered additional measures in Japan. Here Korea decides to suspend the Korea-Japan Military Information Comprehensive Protection Agreement (GSOMIA). This decision was aimed at Japan, but there seemed to be no calculation to try to draw the United States, which has a stake in Korea-US security cooperation, into arbitration. It is unknown how the US, which is reluctant to arbitration, will respond. For the time being, the US is demanding an extension of GSOMIA, showing disappointment. There are no signs of arbitration yet. Even if the United States goes to arbitration, it is not clear whether the direction of arbitration will be the way Korea intends. The way Korea wants is for Japan to withdraw export restrictions and Korea to restore GSOMIA. Japan is opposed to this, and it should come out that a solution to the ruling judgment should be included. If you look for a way from the US position, you might get a card to return to the arbitration committee written in the 1965 agreement. If the US recommends this, Korea will not be accepted this time. Now Korea has to deal with the future impact of the United States triggered by the GSOMIA interruption, but it must also be prepared for Japan's additional measures. Soon after, the sale of seized Japanese assets approaches. Japan has announced a hard-line response. If that happens, South Korea will have to respond. The card is not enough. * Some excerpts from the link below. Continue with the source https://japanese.joins.com/article/795/257795.html?servcode=100§code=140 document.write(” + ”); Related article document.write(” + ”);