[Good news] Korea, “Thank you Abe” is a fashionable wwwwwwwwwwwwwww

[Good news] Korea, “Thank you Abe” is a fashionable wwwwwwwwwwwwwww ● “Thank you Abe” fashion in Korea The intention of thanking you for telling the truth against Korea Hitotsubashi Associate Professor Gon Yeon What is the meaning of “Thank you Abe” that is popular in Korea? [Interview with direct attention] Hitotsubashi University ◇ ◇ ◇ The relationship between Korea and Japan, which is said to be the worst after the war, is an aspect of quagmire. The Abe administration triggered export restrictions against South Korea, triggered by the Korean ruling on the ex-contractors, and the rebellious civilian government entered the GSOMIA (Military Information Comprehensive Protection Agreement). The United States, which should focus on the security cooperation between Japan, the US and South Korea, will not start arbitration. Why has the relationship between Japan and Korea been so far? Is there an exit in the retaliation battle that heats up? I asked a specialist in East Asian international relations history. ――Ripple has spread to the Korean side's GSOMIA destruction notice that was supposed to be. I think it was a heavy decision for President Bun. It was a series of export regulations that worsened Japan-Korea relations until GSOMIA was destroyed. The Japanese side explains that it is a security measure, but there is no doubt that the origin of the problem was the former consignment judgment at the end of October 2018. There was no big wave in Japan-Korea relations until just before that. A symposium commemorating the 20th anniversary of the “Japan-Korea Partnership Declaration” by former Prime Minister Kominato and former President Kim Dae Jung was held in early October. Prime Minister Abe attends and congratulates. There was also a plan for President Bun to visit Japan within the year and hold a summit meeting. ――― The translated version of the president ’s autobiography “Fate” was published in early October. The explanation is written. In August, I was struck by a request from a publisher, but I think there was a blueprint for visiting Japan. It is reported that in the case of the former contributor's judgment, the president of the sentence is structured and an arbitrary judgment is derived by the replacement of the judge of the Grand Court (the Supreme Court), which is a misguided criticism. The appointment of the President of the Supreme Court (Supreme Court Justice) is the president's authority, and there is one aspect in which the change of government can be visualized by replacing the top of the judiciary. The judicial change was a natural process as the adhesion between the previous administration and the judiciary came to light. ■ Incumbent judgment is a domestic issue -In consideration of the Park administration who wants to avoid the deterioration of Japan-Korea relations, the former President of the Great Court was charged with postponing the former contingent judgment. The logic of the judicial side is working behind the background of the bold decision of the Grand Court in the former collection lawsuit. Public opinion on the fact that the government has adhered to the government and has acted injustice is severe. It cannot be said that there is no aspect that has taken courage to show the will of reform. The ex-working decree is a domestic issue. However, I think President Bun is in a position to respect the judgment as a president and as an individual. –It was a human rights lawyer who was closest to the former president, Satoshi Taketake, who advocated "Right politics and the destruction of vested interests." Judgment is a big burden for both the president and the Korean government. I know that it will affect my relationship with Japan, but I cannot intervene. This is because the president was born by the people who condemned and supported the administration of Park before the judiciary. The president should be criticized for lack of explanation to the Japanese side and delayed response. –The Japanese government is in a position to have settled in the 1965 Basic Treaty of Japan and Korea. The Abe administration has repeatedly insisted that it is a violation of international law and is seeking a response. I think that the Korean side would have consulted in advance after predicting the judgment, or if it could not be done, it would continue to send a special envoy to gain understanding. However, Prime Minister Abe said immediately after the ruling that it was “an impossible decision in light of international law” and left no room for dialogue on the Korean side. During this time, the comfort women foundation disbanded and the radar irradiation problem overlapped, and Japan-Korea relations were severely broken. We believe that the movement to the north and south was also affected by this. * Some excerpts from the link below. Continue with the source https://news.nifty.com/article/domestic/government/12136-398328/ document.write(” + ”); Related article document.write(” + ”);

PSJ main banner
Thanks! You've already liked this